References
Medical Aspects
MRI artefact to be expected
1. "The middle fossa approach allows a better visualization of IAC canal in the ipsilateral ear with both implant versions, but the effect is more prominent with the BC1602." (Utrilla et al. 2020)
2. "Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is often limited in patients with auditory implants because of the presence of metallic components and magnets." (Wimmer et al. 2019)
3. "The sequence for metal artifact reduction optimized in Bern enables MRI at 1.5 T in patients with active transcutaneous bone conduction implants without sacrificing diagnostic imaging quality." (Wimmer et al. 2019)
Medical Aspects
Anatomical limitations / space requirements
1. Performance with every implant that is fixed onto or into the temporal bone and lies subcutaneously is influenced (and therefore potentially Imited by) by the recipient's unique anatomy. (HEARRING consensus)
Patient-reported Aspects
Headwear
1. It is required to counsel the recipient about the importance of exact placement of the coil-section of the implant, due to the fact that the audioprocessor might be in the way of helmets, hats or other headwear. (HEARRING consensus)